Council Committee Recommends $220,000 for Aquatic Park Consultants

Vol. III, No. 40 - This whole drama makes a point: Better information on the front end leads to better outcomes on the back end

There is a scene that plays out in council chambers across this country with depressing regularity. Citizens pack meetings. Accusations fly. Officials fumble explanations. Democracy, such as it is, grinds forward with all the grace of a rusted zamboni — and it looks like the Arena maybe getting a new one!

So it was in Council Chambers earlier this week, where a discussion about fixing a 21-year-old pool devolved into the sort of political theater that makes one wonder whether we have forgotten the basic mechanics of governing, or even basic communication. The facts should have been straightforward: the Troy Aquatic Park needs $1.7 million in repairs. A council committee was being asked to recommend spending $220,000 on design work. What followed was a masterclass in how not to communicate the fundamentals of public administration.

And what we saw during the Parks and Recreation Committee meeting could best be described as some officials fumbling over their talking points about pool maintenance. But here's what is easy to miss: this isn't a story about recreational priorities at all—it's about the systematic failure to give accurate information to residents and policy makers.

Last week, council members were given this information below as the City Administration wanted $220,000 for consultants to create work specifications for the $1.7 Million Troy Aquatic Park Improvemenets/Maintenance Project. The breif three-paragrpah memo from the City Administration was not clear on what is going to be done or the impetus of this project. What kind of improvements? What kind of renovations? Why are we talking about this now?

It wasn’t until the meeting where Recreation Director Ken Siler methodically outlined a litany of structural concerns that require immediate attention to maintain basic operations of the pool. Mr. Siler was clear in his assessment, this is not expansion. In other words, this is the municipal equivalent of replacing the furnace when it breaks.

But, the technical details matter because they expose the conceptual muddle. Troy Aquatic Park, constructed in 2004, is at a point where it requires comprehensive infrastructure repairs: deteriorating concrete, failing chemical systems, rotting wood structures, outdated filtration equipment. A study that was completed last year outlined these improvements that Mr. Siler spoke at length about and the estimated costs:

In the end, wha the Committee was being asked to recommend was $220,000 to have consultants create work specifications based on the “General Improvements” and “Existing Pool Shell Improvements” that were outlined in last year’s study; a study that was never referenced in the limited information provided by the City Administration to the committee (and the community, at large).

Yet somehow, routine infrastructure maintenance risked becoming indistinguishable from political preference because critical information was lacking. When citizens hear "$220,000 for pool consultants" while less than a month ago, baseball advocates were told to await master planning results, it’s hard not assume some degree of administrative favortism. The failure lies not with the citizens—their frustration is entirely rational—but with officials who cannot articulate the reasoning behind some of the decisions that are being made.

Earliert this week, this publication talked about the curious timing of this request against the backdrop of telling baseball advocates to wait their turn.

As expected, the City’s Top Bureaucrat decided to rail against this publication on social media.

Doubling down on his line of reasoning, the City’s Top Bureaucrat during the Recreation and Parks Committee Meeting attempted to emphasize the distinction repeatedly. "This has nothing to do with any kind of expansion of the facility," he emphasized, noting the budget line specifically reads "TAP Troy Aquatic Park repair renovation—no expansion." But his explanations landed with the effectiveness of a lead balloon, because the underlying framework was never established.

The problem with the explanation is that it was never made clear in the three-paragraph staff report. So rather than try to explain the position of the City Administration, the city does what the city does - attack those that are using the source documentation that was provided to the community. If this publication is guilty of misleading, the city needs to step up and recognize it’s culpability in providing shoddy information to the public.

It’s rich to throw shade at this publication for misleading “reporting”, when this publication took the committee memorandum provided by the City Administraiton as the basis of the story in question. If the City Administration would provide information that answers more questions than it creates, perhaps these instances of “misleading reporting” wouldn’t happen so often.

No one can argue the obvious. Troy has operated the aquatic park for 21 years. It serves demonstrable public demand. The infrastructure requires repair to continue operating safely. Yet this chain of logic somehow became a political battleground, complete with accusations of "obfuscation and lies" from residents who believe their elected officials are playing favorites with public assets, because there are certain practices that give the green light to spending over $220,000 on consultants with nothing more than three paragraph reports with the hope of two minute committee meetings. Discussion, discourse and transparency are not part of the Troy way of doing things.

But the larger issue transcends Troy entirely. Across this country, municipal governments struggle with the basic communication challenge of explaining what they do and why. Technical infrastructure decisions shouldn't require political theater. When every operational choice becomes a referendum on municipal priorities, the distinction between governing and campaigning disappears entirely.

The meeting revealed a city whose technical competence exceeds its communicative capacity. Troy's aquatic park requires repairs at a time when residents might prefer other recreational amenities. The tragedy is that this unnecessary controversy obscures legitimate questions about public engagement and priority-setting. Citizens deserve better explanations of how their government operates.

Officials need clearer frameworks for distinguishing between operational necessities and strategic choices. And everyone needs to recognize that democratic accountability requires more than passionate advocacy—it requires civic literacy about the basic functions of government.

The price of such confusion is not just inefficient governance—it's the erosion of public confidence in the basic competence of democratic institutions. That's a cost no community can afford.

Share Your Thoughts!

Feel free to take part in today’s poll and thank you for reading today’s newsletter! Our paid subscribers are more than welcome to leave their ideas and insights in the comment thread! If you have comments, this publication will be more than happy to publish your editorial, simply send us your thoughts in an email to pinnaclestrategiesltd@gmail.com and your ideas will be shared with our community!

City Wants YOUR Input on Park Improvements

Now is the time for Troy residents to get involved and advocate for the changes that will truly benefit the community. Your input will help ensure that the city’s limited resources are invested where they are needed most, creating parks and recreation facilities that reflect the real priorities of Troy’s families and youth. Those wanting to participate in the survey can go to: www.troyohio.gov/parkplanning/

Tell Us How You Feel About Your Community!

Our reader survey for this month is looking for responses! Feel free to share your thoughts and ideas on your hometown! You can access the survey here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PF6SPPN

Check out our New YouTube Channel!

Our goal with the Civic Capacity YouTube Channel is to be a centralized location where residents can watch videos of local government meetings in action and also provide comments and insights.

You can check out the channel here!

Thank you to our New Media Partners!

Recently, many of our stories has been showing up on the local news website, www.mymiamicounty.com. We are grateful for the good folks for sharing our work with their audience and we would encourage our readers to check them out at their website!

Our publication would also like to recognize the good work being done at www.piquanewsnow.com. Piqua News Now is a new web-based news and information site for the Miami County area, with a specific focus on Piqua!

In addition, the good folks at Piqua News Now have started a new, 24-hour streaming YouTube channel. This channel is awesome with continuous weather updates and more importanly, it provides a 24-hour audio feed from county wide dispatch. Check it out here!

You Can Help Support This Work!

Our readers and subscribers have been asking for a new way to support the work being done here at Civic Capacity! Some of our readers do not like the idea of having to sign up for another subscription service. Some of our subscribers occasionally want to give more support through a one-time transaction.

Civic Capacity is partnering with “Buy Me A Coffee” to give our readers, subscribers and friends an opportunity to give one-time support to Civic Capacity. Personally, I don’t like coffee, but I will never turn down a nice iced tea. If you feel compelled to support this effort, just click the button below. In other words, this is an online tip jar.

Also, thanks for reading today’s Civic Capacity Newsletter! Please feel free to share this information with your friends and neighbors.

Also, please consider subscribing to our work. If you are a free subscriber, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. For less than $1 a week, you can get timely and conversational updates about the decisions that are impacting you and your community!