At 6:00 p.m. this evening, Troy City Council’s Safety and Health Committee will consider authorizing the city to enter into a $1 million grant agreement with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for a new “River Plaza” project east of downtown.
According to the staff memorandum, Troy applied for $2,700,689.28 through HUD’s FY 2026 Economic Development Initiative Community Project Funding program. In April, the city was notified that it would receive a partial award of $1 million. The city is now asking Council to authorize the grant agreement and permit the Director of Public Service and Safety to execute the documents needed to administer it.
The staff report says the grant will support eligible components of the Great Miami River Recreation Connectivity Project, including construction of a River Plaza watercraft launching area connected to a future downtown river recreation trail.
The memo describes a broader vision for the facility:
“This concept could serve as the next step in extending this trail eastward, supporting the southeast area including future redevelopment of the Spinnaker and Van Cleve sites and eventually connecting to the main trail system near the Broadford Bridge area.”
The city has attempted to connect this project to the larger effort to remove the low-head dam east of downtown. Previous city communications have indicated that roughly $11.6 million has been secured toward an approximately $12.1 million dam-removal project.
But the materials now before Council raise an important question: Was the proposed $2.7 million River Plaza part of that $12.1 million project, or is it a separate project being attached to the broader dam-removal effort?
Based on the materials available, the River Plaza does not appear to be specifically accounted for on the city’s dam-removal project website. Nor is it clear how the plaza’s estimated cost, future design work, construction, or ongoing maintenance would be incorporated into the total cost of the larger river project.
That distinction matters. A $1 million federal grant may be a positive opportunity for Troy. But it does not mean this project is fully funded, free to local taxpayers, or ready for construction.
The memo says the grant will be administered on a reimbursement basis. It also says the city will request a 2027 appropriation from Fund 441 to begin design engineering for future construction. The city has not yet publicly identified the full project budget, its local funding commitment, the precise scope that can be built with the $1 million award, or the source of the remaining funds needed to complete the concept.
Not in the Plan
The timing is notable because Troy recently completed its Master Recreation and Parks Plan.
That plan identifies several high-priority needs and facilities, including Duke Park, the Joe Reardon Skatepark, Miami Shores Golf Course, Troy Aquatic Park, and the Troy Senior Citizens Center. It also discusses the need for a phased strategy for repurposing, reusing, or potentially selling underutilized parks.
The plan recognizes that some areas of Troy may be well served by parkland while other areas lack recreational amenities. Yet the plan does not appear to identify a new River Plaza or waterfront park east of downtown as a named capital priority, costed project, or implementation item.
That does not mean a waterfront plaza is necessarily a bad idea. It does mean residents should ask how the project was identified, how it relates to the adopted parks plan, and where it ranks among other capital needs the city has already identified.
The location itself deserves closer discussion. While the exact site and final scope remain unclear in the Council materials, the proposed plaza would be in an area already served by active-recreation parks such as Boyer and Herrlinger, as well as Fountain Park at the intersection of Franklin and East Main streets.
The city may believe a second riverfront facility fills a different recreational need than a traditional neighborhood park. If so, that case should be made clearly, with a defined public purpose, a complete project budget, and an explanation of why this project should advance before—or alongside—the priorities established in the city’s own parks planning process.
The Question Council Should Answer
The immediate vote concerns a $1 million federal grant. The larger decision concerns a project for which the city originally sought $2.7 million. That leaves approximately $1.7 million unresolved.
Council should determine whether the River Plaza was included in the previously stated $12.1 million cost of the low-head-dam removal project. If it was, the city should show where it is accounted for in the project information and funding plan. If it was not, the community should ask questions about what other amenities that aren’t in the original dam removal plan are going to be added to support the project down the road.
Council should also ask how the River Plaza was identified as a funding priority when it was not specifically named in the recently adopted parks master plan. The committee should understand how this project ranks against the city’s stated priorities at Duke Park, the Joe Reardon Skatepark, Miami Shores Golf Course, Troy Aquatic Park, the Senior Citizens Center, and other capital needs.
The city should also explain what funding will be requested in 2027 through Fund 441 and whether additional appropriations will follow. Most importantly, if the city initially sought $2.7 million but received only $1 million, where will the remaining $1.7 million come from?
The committee and City Council should welcome external funding. But they should also require a complete answer to the basic public-finance question: What total project is Troy committing itself to, and what will city residents be asked to fund beyond this $1 million grant?
Announcing our September Community Survey!
Every other month, this publication takes time to ask our readers how they feel about the happenings in their hometown! What are the challenges? What are the opportunities? Is your hometown headed in the right direction? Our survey is the easiest way for you to express your thoughts. Next month, this publication will report out on the results.
Thanks for your time and your participation! It is greatly appreciated!
This is what it looks like when residents stay informed. If you find value in this work, share it with a neighbor, a colleague, or anyone who cares about this community. Paid subscriptions keep it going — $5 a month.
Civic Capacity runs on one thing: readers who believe local journalism matters. If you want to support this work without a subscription, you can now make a one-time contribution through Buy Me a Coffee — or in my case, Buy Me an Iced Tea. Click the button below. Every contribution goes directly into the work you read here every day.