New Rules Proposed for Piqua City Commission Meetings

The Commission is balancing efficiency and effectiveness with giving opportunities to hear those they are serving.

At the last Piqua City Commission meeting, the commission held the first reading on an ordinance that will change the rules of their meeting procedures. From the first reading, it appears that the goal the Commission has is to streamline meetings while fostering a respectful environment. While these rules may initially seem like minor administrative adjustments, they have significant implications for civic engagement and the democratic process in our city. Here’s an in-depth look at the key components of these changes and their potential impacts.

Public Participation and Comment

Public comment is a cornerstone of democratic governance, allowing citizens to voice their opinions on matters affecting their community. The proposed rules stipulate that citizens can comment on agenda items after the agenda is set and before the Commission begins its deliberations. As originally written, each person is allowed a three-minute window to speak, with non-citizens also granted this right if the matter affects their business or utility services within Piqua. The Commission did amend the three-minute time limit to five minutes, which is a certain positive. However,

The inclusion of non-citizens in public comment underscores the Commission’s recognition of the interconnectedness of our community. Businesses and service recipients contribute significantly to the local economy and should have a say in relevant decisions. However, limiting each speaker to one comment per agenda item and restricting public input during Commission debates may hinder a dynamic exchange of ideas.

Non-Agenda Public Comment

Non-agenda public comment sessions are a critical avenue for civic engagement. These sessions are restricted to a five-minute limit per person, ensuring that meetings do not drag on indefinitely. However, the cut-off time of 9 p.m. for non-agenda comments might be seen a practical measure to prevent excessively long meetings. In reality, this rule will inadvertently limit participation from the residents that the Commission is there to serve. It is a curious rule, because I have never been in a meeting of a public body that had an arbitrary end time. The meeting was over when the agenda was finished, including public comments, if it was on the agenda.

It is worth reminding every elected local elected official that these individuals are there to serve the resident. If there is a line of 1,000 residents who want to talk about trash collection, police protection, traffic management, water quality or whatever, these residents should have the opportunity to be heard, regardless of however long the meeting goes.

If we are trying to increase civic capacity in our communities, things like time limits and comments cards don’t necessarily help the cause. However, the public should understand that those aspects can help make meetings more productive and more efficient, and should be willing to put up with these new regulations. But, adding an arbitrary shutoff of 9:00 p.m. almost seems ripe for abuse. Add a few public presentations to an already long agenda and meetings can easily last past 9:00 p.m. There is a difference between trying to make a government meeting more efficient and shutting the public completely out of the decision-making process.

Rules of Conduct

The conduct rules are designed to maintain order and decorum during meetings. Prohibiting obscene comments, physical threats, disruptive conduct, and hate speech is crucial for ensuring a respectful environment. Similarly, banning loud, boisterous behavior, cheering, jeering, and the use of signs and noisemakers helps prevent disruptions. However, a spontaneous round of respectful applause should not be completely frowned upon; people should be able to express some agreement or disagreement with a speaker in some manner.

One of the more contentious aspects is the enforcement mechanism. The Mayor or presiding officer has the authority to warn and, if necessary, expel individuals who violate these rules. While maintaining order is essential, there is a risk that this power could be used to silence dissent. Hopefully these clear guidelines can provide the oversight that is necessary to ensure this authority is exercised fairly.

Balancing Efficiency and Civic Engagement

The proposed rules reflect a careful balance between efficiency and civic engagement. By structuring meetings and establishing clear conduct guidelines, the Commission aims to make its proceedings more orderly and efficient. However, these measures should not come at the expense of robust public participation.

To enhance civic engagement, the Commission could consider additional measures such as providing more opportunities for interactive dialogue and ensuring that all voices are heard, especially during non-agenda public comment sessions. Transparency in how the rules are applied and flexibility in accommodating various viewpoints will be crucial.

Bring it All Together

The Piqua City Commission’s proposed procedural rules and conduct guidelines represent a significant step toward more structured and orderly meetings. By outlining clear processes and maintaining decorum, these rules can enhance the efficiency of Commission meetings. However, the Commission must remain vigilant to ensure these rules do not stifle public participation or limit the democratic exchange of ideas.

As these rules are debated and potentially implemented, it is essential for the citizens of Piqua to stay informed and engaged. Participating in public comment sessions, providing feedback to the Commission, and holding our elected officials accountable will ensure that these procedural changes serve the best interests of the community. By striking the right balance between order and engagement, we can foster a more inclusive and effective local government and enhance civic capacity in all our communities.

What do you think? Will the new rules help increase civic participation? Will these new rules limit public input? Can a good compromise be found? Our paid subscribers are more than welcome to provide their comments and ideas in our comment thread!

Thanks for reading today’s Civic Capacity Newsletter! Please feel free to share this information with your friends and neighbors.

Also, please consider subscribing to our work. If you are a free subscriber, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. For less than $1 a week, you can get timely and conversational updates about the decisions that are impacting you and your community!

Finally, our reader survey for July is looking for responses! Feel free to share your thoughts and ideas on your hometown! You can access the survey here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PF6SPPN