Personnel Committee Recommends Labor Negotiators to Full Council

Labor contracts with the city's six labor unions expire at year's end

This past Monday, the City Council's Personnel Committee convened to address the critical issue of retaining legal counsel for negotiating the city's six labor union contracts, all set to expire at the end of 2024. As negotiations with the labor unions commence, a look back at recent labor contract negotiations reveals a path fraught with challenges.

The City of Troy's negotiations with the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) have been notably drawn out, particularly in 2015 and 2022. In both instances, the state-mandated fact-finding process was crucial in advancing negotiations. An independent fact-finder was appointed to review proposals, assess both parties' positions, and issue recommendations. However, these recommendations were not binding, often leaving the city and the union at an impasse.

The negotiation process in 2022 was particularly protracted. An agreement, initially slated to take effect on January 1, 2022, wasn't finalized until October 12, 2022. This delay underscores not only the complexity of the issues but also the challenge of balancing the union's needs and demands with the city’s fiscal constraints and the broader community interests.

At the heart of the committee meeting was the rehiring of Jackson Lewis PC, a law firm with a longstanding partnership with the city. This seemingly routine decision sparked a public query, notably from local resident Steve Henriksen, who questioned whether the firm was indeed the best choice and if alternative options had been explored.

The city administration, led by it’s top bureaucrat, justified continuing with Jackson Lewis PC, emphasizing the firm's extensive experience with Troy's labor contracts and bargaining positions. Their competitive rates and familiarity with the city's intricacies, he argued, translate to cost savings in the long run.

However, Henriksen raised a critical point: the potential downside of minimal turnover and the absence of fresh perspectives. His concerns reflect a broader governance dilemma: balancing consistency with the need for innovation.

It's noteworthy that labor peace between the City and the IAFF has been elusive at times; the most recent contract was approved ten months into the contract period. This raises the question: Could different legal representation lead to a better and more timely outcome? Another prolonged negotiation process could adversely affect public perception of the city's ability to effectively manage labor union negotiations while maintaining high-quality public services.

The experiences of 2015 and 2022, coupled with the ongoing debate over legal representation, impart vital lessons for Troy. The city's approach to labor negotiations and legal counsel selection must be dynamic, transparent, and attuned to the evolving needs of public safety personnel and the community. A more efficient, transparent, and equitable negotiation process is essential for building trust, maintaining public safety standards, and safeguarding the city’s financial health.

While the council committee defended their choice, highlighting the firm's competent negotiations and alignment with council directives, this defense appeared to overlook the fundamental issue raised by Hendrickson: the necessity for actively seeking potential improvements.

The meeting, informative as it was, also underscored areas where the council could bolster its engagement and transparency. Granted, this is challenging. Labor negotations between the city and it’s unions are subject to executive sessions and contracts with legal firms do not have to go through any competitive bidding process. However, detailed explanations regarding the decision-making process, criteria for evaluating the firm's performance, and an explicit discussion of considered alternatives (if any) would offer greater clarity and public reassurance.

In conclusion, the Troy City Council's Personnel Committee, while efficient and familiar with its contractors, is reminded of the imperative for continual evaluation and adaptability. Proactive governance involves more than relying on past successes; it necessitates actively pursuing potential improvements. Deepening engagement with public concerns and openness to exploring new options could significantly enhance the council's effectiveness and public trust.

Thanks for reading today’s Civic Capacity Newsletter; a publication that strives to be a source of information about the decisions made in your community. If you have found this information helpful, please feel free to share it with your friends and neighbors and leave your ideas and insights in the comment section below.