Should Non Residents Pay More for Using the City Pool?
Vol. IV. No. 43 - Recreation and Parks Committee Wants to Explore Non-Resident Rates for City Pool
At this week’s Recreation and Parks Committee meeting, most of the attention was on the rising cost of repairs at the Troy Aquatic Park. But within that larger discussion, a smaller idea emerged that could have a direct impact on how people use one of the city’s most popular amenities.
Councilmember Madison Hickman suggested that the city explore implementing different rates for residents and non-residents at the aquatic park. The concept is straightforward: if Troy taxpayers are helping fund both the operation and long-term maintenance of the facility, should those who live outside the city pay more to use it?
It’s a question that touches on fairness, and one that likely resonates with many residents. The aquatic park is a heavily used facility, especially during peak summer months, and complaints about crowding are not uncommon. A higher non-resident rate could, in theory, accomplish two things at once—provide some financial distinction for residents while also easing demand from outside the city. It’s also not a new or untested idea. Several nearby communities, including Tipp City, Vandalia, and Huber Heights, already use some version of resident and non-resident pricing.
At the same time, the discussion at the committee level made clear that what sounds simple in concept becomes more complicated in practice. City staff pointed out that implementing a residency-based pricing system would require changes to how the pool currently operates. Much of the front-line staffing at the aquatic park is seasonal, and adding the responsibility of verifying residency—especially during busy periods—could create delays or inconsistencies. The process becomes even more complicated when factoring in that many pool passes are now purchased online, which would likely require additional steps or system changes to confirm who qualifies for a resident rate.
There are also financial considerations that don’t immediately stand out. While the aquatic park operates close to break-even on a yearly basis, covering its day-to-day costs through admissions and concessions, that doesn’t extend to major capital improvements like the renovation project currently under consideration. Even if a non-resident rate were implemented, it would not significantly offset those larger, long-term expenses. And there is a potential trade-off to consider: if higher prices discourage non-residents from attending, the city could see a reduction in overall usage, which in turn could affect revenue.
For now, no decisions have been made. The City’s Recreation Board is expected to take a closer look at the idea, likely as part of its regular review of rates later in the year. That process will give the city an opportunity to better understand who is using the facility, how other communities manage similar systems, and whether the potential benefits outweigh the added complexity.
What this conversation ultimately highlights is a broader question about the role of public amenities like the aquatic park. Should they primarily serve the residents who fund them through taxes, or should they function as regional assets that welcome broader use without distinction? However the city answers that question will not only shape decisions about pool pricing, but also influence how future investments in parks and recreation are approached.
For now, the idea is still in its early stages. But as the city continues to weigh significant investment into the aquatic park, conversations like this one are likely to become more central to how those decisions are made—and how they are paid for.
Announcing our July Community Survey!
Every other month, this publication takes time to ask our readers how they feel about the happenings in their hometown! What are the challenges? What are the opportunities? Is your hometown headed in the right direction? Our survey is the easiest way for you to express your thoughts. Next month, this publication will report out on the results.
Thanks for your time and your participation! It is greatly appreciated!
This is what it looks like when residents stay informed. If you find value in this work, share it with a neighbor, a colleague, or anyone who cares about this community. Paid subscriptions keep it going — $5 a month.
Civic Capacity runs on one thing: readers who believe local journalism matters. If you want to support this work without a subscription, you can now make a one-time contribution through Buy Me a Coffee — or in my case, Buy Me an Iced Tea. Click the button below. Every contribution goes directly into the work you read here every day.