Will Residential Stability Zones Come to Ohio?
New State Legislation Proposes a New Way to Provide for Property Tax Cuts
This week, State Senators Michelle Reynolds and Hearcel Craig, both representing portions of the Greater Columbus area teamed up to introduce Senate Bill 42. It’s not often that this publication takes a look at what happens at the Statehouse, but the subject of Senate Bill 42, is all about property taxes; and these are revenues that are largely collected and distributed on the local level. In other words, given the local impacts of the bill, it’s certainly worth discussing. Furthermore, the bill appears to pick up on some of the work the previous General Assembly talked about in providing substantial reform to property taxes within the state. A topic that this publication recently covered.
Senate Bill 42 proposes these significant changes that could have far-reaching implications for local governments across the state. And while Senate Bill 42 was recently introduced, it is worth exploring the key aspects of the bill and their potential impact on local governance, community development, and fiscal policy.
The primary purpose of SB 42 is to authorize local governments to create "residential stability zones" where homeowners may qualify for partial property tax exemptions. This represents a novel approach to addressing housing affordability and community stability issues at the local level.
Local governments would gain the authority to designate specific areas as residential stability zones. This new tool could allow municipalities and counties to target neighborhoods facing challenges such as gentrification, rapid property value increases, or declining homeownership rates. This increased local control over housing policy offers the potential to preserve community character and demographics, but it also necessitates careful planning and criteria development for zone designation.
Within these zones, homeowners could qualify for partial exemptions from property taxes. While the exact details of the exemption process are not provided in the language of the bill itself, this provision suggests a significant shift in how property taxes are applied. This could lead to a potential reduction in local tax revenues and would require clear eligibility criteria and application processes. On the flip side, it might also mean that local County Auditors, that implement local property tax collection, could face an increased administrative workload.
The bill includes amendments to how manufactured and mobile homes are taxed, including references to exemptions under the proposed Section 5709.29 to the Ohio Revised Code. This indicates that the residential stability zone concept may extend to manufactured housing communities as well, leading to more complex tax assessment procedures for certain types of housing. This change could potentially result in more equitable treatment of different housing types but would necessitate updated training and systems in county auditor offices.
The ability to create residential stability zones could help local governments maintain diverse, stable neighborhoods in the face of economic pressures. By offering tax incentives in specific areas, local governments could encourage investment and homeownership in neighborhoods that need it most. The bill appears to give local authorities more options in addressing housing affordability and community stability, allowing for tailored solutions to local challenges.
However, any property tax exemption will likely result in reduced revenues for local governments, especially school districts, that still rely heavily on property tax revenues. Careful fiscal analysis would be necessary to understand and mitigate these impacts. Implementing new zones and exemption processes will require additional administrative resources and expertise at the local level. Local governments will need to ensure that the designation of residential stability zones and the application of exemptions are done fairly and without discriminatory effects.
The success of this program may depend on coordination between county and municipal governments along with school districts, particularly in urban areas with overlapping jurisdictions. Local governments will also need to consider how these zones fit into broader comprehensive plans and long-term development strategies.
If SB 42 becomes law, local governments would need to develop clear criteria for establishing residential stability zones, create processes for homeowners to apply for and receive exemptions, update property assessment and tax collection systems, conduct public outreach and education about the new program, and monitor the fiscal impact and effectiveness of the zones over time.
This bill represents a shift towards more localized control over property tax policy, traditionally a state-level concern. It could set a precedent for further devolution of tax policy to local governments in Ohio and potentially influence similar legislation in other states. The concept of residential stability zones also reflects growing concerns about housing affordability and neighborhood change across the United States. Local governments in Ohio could become leaders in testing innovative approaches to these challenges.
Senate Bill 42 offers Ohio's local governments a potentially powerful new tool for addressing housing and community development challenges. However, it also presents significant implementation challenges and potential fiscal impacts that would require careful consideration. Local leaders would need to weigh the potential benefits of increased policy flexibility against the administrative and financial costs of implementing such a program.
As the bill progresses through the legislative process, local government officials, housing advocates, and fiscal policy experts will likely engage in robust debate about its merits and potential consequences. Regardless of the outcome, SB 42 represents an important conversation about the role of local governments in shaping housing policy and promoting community stability in Ohio.
What Do You Think?
Our paid subscribers are more than welcome to share their ideas and thoughts on this new idea in the comment thread. Of course, longer pieces are always welcome. If you want to share your thoughts without the limits of word counts and paywalls, you can always send your writing to pinnaclestrategiesltd@gmail.com and it will be run in a future edition of Civic Capacity.
Check out our New YouTube Channel!
Our goal with the Civic Capacity YouTube Channel is to be a centralized location where residents can watch videos of local government meetings in action and also provide comments and insights. You can check out the channel here!
You Can Help Support This Work!
Our readers and subscribers have been asking for a new way to support the work being done here at Civic Capacity! Some of our readers do not like the idea of having to sign up for another subscription service. Some of our subscribers occasionally want to give more support through a one-time transaction.
Civic Capacity is partnering with “Buy Me A Coffee” to give our readers, subscribers and friends an opportunity to give one-time support to Civic Capacity. Personally, I don’t like coffee, but I will never turn down a nice iced tea. If you feel compelled to support this effort, just click the button below.
Thanks for reading today’s Civic Capacity Newsletter! Please feel free to share this information with your friends and neighbors.
Also, please consider subscribing to our work. If you are a free subscriber, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. For less than $1 a week, you can get timely and conversational updates about the decisions that are impacting you and your community!
Thanks for sharing. Subject is complicated and we all need to try to get educated about system and any new ideas to improve it.